Attendees
Representatives from Te Kawa Mataaho | Public Service Commission
Members of the Expert Advisory Panel
Representatives from civil society organisations
Topics for discussion
This session was used to discuss the idea analysis to date and methodology.
Notes
- The distinction between participation, democracy and public service is blurry and should be worked through again
- How can we think about this in terms of a framework of openness practice (foundation, reach, quality, impact) – can we review the ideas against this
- Category names need to be simple and clear, should review – this also addresses the crossover of the categories described above
- Officials need to be ready to talk about how initiatives align with current workplan and strategy at the next meeting
- Use this thinking to present the data differently, for example a scattergram that captures multiple dimensions
- Need to check through ‘other’ category to make sure they have been properly classified. For example, environmental/climate change ideas, including acceding to the Aarhus Convention
- Te Kawa Mataaho to re-cut the ideas and look at a way to visually represent it for next meeting of wider group